1960 Austin 7 vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin 7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin 7 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 343 more horse power than 1960 Austin 7. (33 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin 7. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1694 kg more than 1960 Austin 7. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm) has 484 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin 7. (60 Nm). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin 7.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin 7 | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | 7 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 33 HP | 376 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 544 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 68.3 mm | 102 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 5329 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2030 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1935 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 100 L |
