1960 Austin A 40 vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Volkswagen 1500 (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Volkswagen 1500 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Volkswagen 1500 weights approximately 170 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 40 | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | A 40 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 40 L |