1960 Austin A 40 vs. 1975 Citroen Ami
To start off, 1975 Citroen Ami is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Citroen Ami (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1975 Citroen Ami should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 40 weights approximately 35 kg more than 1975 Citroen Ami.
Because 1960 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 40 | 1975 Citroen Ami | |
| Make | Austin | Citroen |
| Model | A 40 | Ami |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 602 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 725 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2390 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 27 L |
