1960 Austin A 40 vs. 1981 Renault 9
To start off, 1981 Renault 9 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Renault 9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Renault 9 (67 HP) has 33 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Renault 9 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Renault 9 weights approximately 100 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Renault 9 (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1981 Renault 9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 40 | 1981 Renault 9 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | 9 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 77 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 38 L |