1960 Austin A 40 vs. 1986 Dodge Lancer
To start off, 1986 Dodge Lancer is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,211 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Dodge Lancer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Dodge Lancer (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Dodge Lancer weights approximately 440 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Dodge Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 40 | 1986 Dodge Lancer | |
Make | Austin | Dodge |
Model | A 40 | Lancer |
Year Released | 1960 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2211 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2630 mm |