1960 Austin A 40 vs. 2003 Dodge Ram

To start off, 2003 Dodge Ram is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Ram (215 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Ram, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Dodge Ram (319 Nm) has 251 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2003 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications: