1960 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 BMW 325
To start off, 2004 BMW 325 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,490 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 BMW 325 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 BMW 325 (184 HP @ 7250 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 BMW 325 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 BMW 325 weights approximately 835 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 BMW 325 (237 Nm) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2004 BMW 325 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 40 | 2004 BMW 325 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 40 | 325 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 2490 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 184 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7250 RPM |
Torque | 68 Nm | 237 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 62.9 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1595 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 26 L | 63 L |