1960 Austin A 40 vs. 2004 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Westfield XTR 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 (173 HP @ 9800 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Westfield XTR 2 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 40 weights approximately 316 kg more than 2004 Westfield XTR 2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 40 | 2004 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Austin | Westfield |
| Model | A 40 | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
| Engine Size | 997 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 444 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2320 mm |
