1960 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Galant

To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,835 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Galant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant (230 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Galant weights approximately 855 kg more than 1960 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Galant (339 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Galant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 40 2005 Mitsubishi Galant
Make Austin Mitsubishi
Model A 40 Galant
Year Released 1960 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 997 cc 3835 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 34 HP 230 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 339 Nm
Engine Bore Size 62.9 mm 95 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 760 kg 1615 kg
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 4840 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1480 mm
Wheelbase Size 2130 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 26 L 67 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]