1960 Austin A 40 vs. 2005 Smart Roadster

To start off, 2005 Smart Roadster is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 997 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Smart Roadster (101 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Smart Roadster should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Smart Roadster (130 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Smart Roadster will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 40 2005 Smart Roadster
Make Austin Smart
Model A 40 Roadster
Year Released 1960 2005
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 997 cc 698 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 34 HP 101 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 68 Nm 130 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 62.9 mm 66.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 67 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 3670 mm 3430 mm
Vehicle Width 1520 mm 1620 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1200 mm
Wheelbase Size 2130 mm 2370 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 26 L 35 L