1960 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2010 Holden Cruze is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 104 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 40. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 40.
Because 1960 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Cruze (148 Nm) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 40. (68 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 40 | 2010 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Austin | Holden |
Model | A 40 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 997 cc | 1364 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 148 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1520 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2130 mm | 2685 mm |