1960 Austin A 55 vs. 1946 Buick 40
To start off, 1960 Austin A 55 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Buick 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Buick 40 would be higher. At 4,066 cc (8 cylinders), 1946 Buick 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1946 Buick 40 (108 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1946 Buick 40 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1946 Buick 40 weights approximately 523 kg more than 1960 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 55 | 1946 Buick 40 | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 55 | 40 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1946 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 4066 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1645 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 3000 mm |