1960 Austin A 55 vs. 1985 Plymouth Sundance
To start off, 1985 Plymouth Sundance is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,212 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Plymouth Sundance is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1985 Plymouth Sundance (96 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Plymouth Sundance weights approximately 53 kg more than 1960 Austin A 55. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Plymouth Sundance, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 55 | 1985 Plymouth Sundance | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | A 55 | Sundance |
Year Released | 1960 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 4350 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1122 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2470 mm |