1960 Austin A 55 vs. 2010 Smart ForTwo

To start off, 2010 Smart ForTwo is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 55 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 55. (51 HP @ 4350 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 55. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 55 weights approximately 282 kg more than 2010 Smart ForTwo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 55 (111 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Smart ForTwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 55 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Smart ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 55 2010 Smart ForTwo
Make Austin Smart
Model A 55 ForTwo
Year Released 1960 2010
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1489 cc 1000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 51 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 4350 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 111 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 2100 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1122 kg 840 kg
Vehicle Length 4530 mm 2695 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1560 mm
Vehicle Height 1530 mm 1542 mm
Wheelbase Size 2530 mm 1867 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 33 L