1960 Austin A 55 vs. 2011 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2011 Honda CR-V is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 55. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 55.
Because 1960 Austin A 55 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 55. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 239 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 55. (111 Nm). This means 2011 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 55 | 2011 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Austin | Honda |
| Model | A 55 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |
