1960 Austin A 55 vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 55. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 55 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (187 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 55. (51 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 55.
Because 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin A 55. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee (320 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 55. (111 Nm). This means 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 55.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 55 | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 55 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1489 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 111 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1755 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |