1960 Austin A 90 vs. 1972 Mazda RX-4
To start off, 1972 Mazda RX-4 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda RX-4 (114 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda RX-4 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 90 (214 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda RX-4. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda RX-4.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 90 | 1972 Mazda RX-4 | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 90 | RX-4 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2520 mm |