1960 Austin A 90 vs. 1980 Volvo 260

To start off, 1980 Volvo 260 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Volvo 260 (146 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Volvo 260 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 150 kg more than 1980 Volvo 260.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Volvo 260 (218 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 90. (214 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1980 Volvo 260 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 90.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 90 1980 Volvo 260
Make Austin Volvo
Model A 90 260
Year Released 1960 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2912 cc 2664 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 102 HP 146 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5700 RPM
Torque 214 Nm 218 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 7.2:1 9.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1500 kg 1350 kg
Vehicle Length 4780 mm 4890 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2660 mm