1960 Austin A 90 vs. 1992 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1992 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Ford Ranger (109 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90.
Because 1992 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin A 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 90 | 1992 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2298 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1760 mm |