1960 Austin A 90 vs. 1998 Toyota RAV4
To start off, 1998 Toyota RAV4 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Toyota RAV4 (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Toyota RAV4 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1998 Toyota RAV4.
Because 1998 Toyota RAV4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin A 90. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Toyota RAV4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 90 (214 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Toyota RAV4. (178 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Toyota RAV4.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 90 | 1998 Toyota RAV4 | |
Make | Austin | Toyota |
Model | A 90 | RAV4 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 178 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1700 mm |