1960 Austin A 90 vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2001 Volvo SCC is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 49 kg more than 2001 Volvo SCC.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Volvo SCC (285 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 90. (214 Nm). This means 2001 Volvo SCC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 90. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 1960 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1960 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 90 | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Austin | Volvo |
| Model | A 90 | SCC |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |
