1960 Austin A 90 vs. 2004 Ford F-150
To start off, 2004 Ford F-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford F-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford F-150 (380 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 278 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford F-150 should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 177 kg more than 2004 Ford F-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford F-150 (610 Nm) has 396 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 90. (214 Nm). This means 2004 Ford F-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 90 | 2004 Ford F-150 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 90 | F-150 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 380 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 610 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 8.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1323 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 95 L |