1960 Austin A 90 vs. 2005 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2005 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Hardbody (155 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 90. (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 5 kg more than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 90 (214 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Hardbody. (209 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Hardbody.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 90 | 2005 Nissan Hardbody | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 90 | Hardbody |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 102 HP | 155 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 209 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1495 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 82 L |
