1960 Austin A 90 vs. 2012 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2012 Opel Meriva is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 90 (102 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2012 Opel Meriva. (94 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 90 should accelerate faster than 2012 Opel Meriva.
Because 1960 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 90 (214 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Opel Meriva. (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 90 | 2012 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Austin | Opel |
Model | A 90 | Meriva |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1248 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 214 Nm | 180 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |