1960 Austin A 90 vs. 2012 Volvo C30
To start off, 2012 Volvo C30 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 90 weights approximately 49 kg more than 2012 Volvo C30.
Because 1960 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 136 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 90. (214 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 90.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 90 | 2012 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Austin | Volvo |
Model | A 90 | C30 |
Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 214 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |