1960 Austin A 99 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 99 (106 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 99 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 99 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Austin | Mazda |
Model | A 99 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1960 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 224 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |