1960 Austin A 99 vs. 1969 Renault 8
To start off, 1969 Renault 8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 99 (106 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1969 Renault 8. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1969 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 99 weights approximately 744 kg more than 1969 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin A 99 | 1969 Renault 8 | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 99 | 8 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2910 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 38 L |