1960 Austin A 99 vs. 1975 Mazda 818

To start off, 1975 Mazda 818 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 99 (106 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1975 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda 818. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 99 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1975 Mazda 818. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda 818.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 99 1975 Mazda 818
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 99 818
Year Released 1960 1975
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 1272 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 106 HP 68 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 92 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4080 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1600 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2320 mm