1960 Austin A 99 vs. 1992 Rover 400

To start off, 1992 Rover 400 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin A 99 (106 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1992 Rover 400. (86 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin A 99 should accelerate faster than 1992 Rover 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin A 99 weights approximately 354 kg more than 1992 Rover 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1960 Austin A 99 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Austin A 99. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 99 (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Rover 400. (180 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1960 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 99 1992 Rover 400
Make Austin Rover
Model A 99 400
Year Released 1960 1992
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 1769 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 86 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 4300 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 22.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1176 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2560 mm