1960 Austin A 99 vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 2,910 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin A 99 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 10 kg more than 1960 Austin A 99.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin A 99. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Austin A 99 (224 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker. (217 Nm). This means 1960 Austin A 99 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 99 | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 99 | Tracker |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 217 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2210 mm |
