1960 Austin A 99 vs. 2006 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2006 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 5,881 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Dodge Ram (325 HP @ 2900 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 99. (106 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 99.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Dodge Ram (827 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 603 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 99.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Austin A 99 | 2006 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Austin | Dodge |
| Model | A 99 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2910 cc | 5881 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 325 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Torque | 224 Nm | 827 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 6300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 4080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 129 L |
