1960 Austin A 99 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin A 99. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin A 99 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 208 more horse power than 1960 Austin A 99. (106 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin A 99. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 238 kg more than 1960 Austin A 99. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin A 99. (224 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin A 99. 2013 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1960 Austin A 99 has manual transmission. 1960 Austin A 99 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin A 99 2013 Cadillac CTS
Make Austin Cadillac
Model A 99 CTS
Year Released 1960 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2910 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 106 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 4750 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 224 Nm 373 Nm
Torque RPM 2500 RPM 4900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.4 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.9 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 11.3
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1530 kg 1768 kg
Vehicle Length 4950 mm 4788 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1882 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1442 mm
Wheelbase Size 2800 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 68 L