1960 Austin Princess vs. 1961 DKW Munga
To start off, 1961 DKW Munga is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin Princess (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1961 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1961 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin Princess weights approximately 1064 kg more than 1961 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1961 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin Princess | 1961 DKW Munga | |
Make | Austin | DKW |
Model | Princess | Munga |
Year Released | 1960 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 7.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1116 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 31 L |