1960 Austin Princess vs. 1984 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1984 Ford Ranger is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Austin Princess (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1984 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1960 Austin Princess should accelerate faster than 1984 Ford Ranger.
Because 1984 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Austin Princess. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1984 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1960 Austin Princess has manual transmission. 1960 Austin Princess will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1984 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Austin Princess | 1984 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Princess | Ranger |
Year Released | 1960 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5470 mm | 4690 mm |