1960 Austin Princess vs. 1991 Jaguar XJS

To start off, 1991 Jaguar XJS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin Princess would be higher. At 3,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Austin Princess is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Jaguar XJS (217 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1960 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin Princess. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Austin Princess weights approximately 550 kg more than 1991 Jaguar XJS.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Jaguar XJS (331 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1991 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin Princess 1991 Jaguar XJS
Make Austin Jaguar
Model Princess XJS
Year Released 1960 1991
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 3590 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 217 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 331 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2180 kg 1630 kg
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1270 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2600 mm