1960 Austin Princess vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS-V

To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Austin Princess. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Austin Princess would be higher. At 6,162 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (542 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 424 more horse power than 1960 Austin Princess. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 1960 Austin Princess.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Cadillac CTS-V (550 Nm @ 6200 RPM) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Austin Princess. (251 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Cadillac CTS-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Austin Princess.

Compare all specifications:

1960 Austin Princess 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
Make Austin Cadillac
Model Princess CTS-V
Year Released 1960 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3993 cc 6162 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 542 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 251 Nm 550 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 6200 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.3:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5470 mm 4870 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1780 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 3360 mm 2890 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 54 L 68 L