1960 Bentley S2 vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Bentley S2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Bentley S2 would be higher. At 6,229 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 Bentley S2 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1960 Bentley S2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Bentley S2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 Bentley S2 | 1995 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
| Make | Bentley | Oldsmobile |
| Model | S2 | Aurora |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6229 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5380 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 81 L | 70 L |
