1960 Berkeley Twosome vs. 1963 Ford Cortina
To start off, 1963 Ford Cortina is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Berkeley Twosome. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Berkeley Twosome would be higher. At 1,198 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Ford Cortina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ford Cortina (49 HP) has 31 more horse power than 1960 Berkeley Twosome. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ford Cortina should accelerate faster than 1960 Berkeley Twosome.
Because 1963 Ford Cortina is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Ford Cortina. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1960 Berkeley Twosome, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Ford Cortina (90 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Berkeley Twosome. (37 Nm). This means 1963 Ford Cortina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Berkeley Twosome.
Compare all specifications:
1960 Berkeley Twosome | 1963 Ford Cortina | |
Make | Berkeley | Ford |
Model | Twosome | Cortina |
Year Released | 1960 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 328 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 37 Nm | 90 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 62 mm | 58.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3130 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1280 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 1790 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |