1960 BMW 501 vs. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 1960 BMW 501 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom would be higher. At 5,673 cc (8 cylinders), 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 515 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 1950 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | BMW | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 501 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1950 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 5673 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 164 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1860 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 3690 mm |
