1960 BMW 501 vs. 2001 Toyota RSC
To start off, 2001 Toyota RSC is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 4,164 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota RSC is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota RSC weights approximately 51 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 2001 Toyota RSC is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota RSC will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 501 | 2001 Toyota RSC | |
Make | BMW | Toyota |
Model | 501 | RSC |
Year Released | 1960 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 4164 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 194 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1396 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2510 mm |