1960 BMW 501 vs. 2002 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2002 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 50 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 2002 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 501 | 2002 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | BMW | Jeep |
Model | 501 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1960 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |