1960 BMW 501 vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Clio weights approximately 185 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 501 | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | BMW | Renault |
Model | 501 | Clio |
Year Released | 1960 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 251 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |