1960 BMW 501 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Ranger weights approximately 505 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 501 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2990 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |
