1960 BMW 501 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 2010 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | BMW | Jeep |
| Model | 501 | Commander |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 5652 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 322 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 2355 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 78 L |
