1960 BMW 501 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 570 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 2011 Cadillac CTS-V | |
| Make | BMW | Cadillac |
| Model | 501 | CTS-V |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 556 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1455 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2880 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 68 L |
