1960 BMW 501 vs. 2011 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2011 Volvo XC60 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 450 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 1960 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Volvo XC60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 2011 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | BMW | Volvo |
| Model | 501 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 240 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1795 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4628 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1712 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2748 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |
