1960 BMW 501 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 501 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Equinox weights approximately 368 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Equinox is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 501. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Equinox will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 2012 Chevrolet Equinox | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 501 | Equinox |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1713 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4770 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1684 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2858 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 71 L |
