1960 BMW 501 vs. 2013 Chevrolet Impala
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Impala is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 501. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 501 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 333 kg more than 1960 BMW 501.
Because 1960 BMW 501 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 BMW 501. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Impala, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 501 | 2013 Chevrolet Impala | |
| Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
| Model | 501 | Impala |
| Year Released | 1960 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1678 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1851 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1491 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2807 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |
