1960 BMW 502 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 1967 Jaguar 240 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 2,580 cc (8 cylinders), 1960 BMW 502 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 30 kg more than 1960 BMW 502. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1960 BMW 502 | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | BMW | Jaguar |
Model | 502 | 240 |
Year Released | 1960 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2580 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1410 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 54 L |