1960 BMW 502 vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 BMW 502. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 BMW 502 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1960 BMW 502. (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1960 BMW 502.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 BMW 502. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1960 BMW 502 has manual transmission. 1960 BMW 502 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1960 BMW 502 | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | BMW | Ford |
| Model | 502 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1960 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2580 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4690 mm |
